Does When Women At Prayer Opens His face, shows that (face it) is not Aurat?

Does When Women At Prayer Opens His face, shows that (face it) is not Aurat?

Question :

In Islam prohibited from opening the genitalia in prayer. If a woman in a prayer opening the face, whether it demonstrates that the niqab (face cover) is not compulsory and the woman's face rather than genitals?

------------------------------------------------------------
Answers :

Alhamdulillah.

Is not justified to argue with a woman who uncovers (cover) his face in prayer shows that the face was not the genitals.

Explanation (thing) that is: That is not in the Qur'an and Sunnah Nabawiyah who ordered people who pray to close the external genitalia and open it in prayer. So it is not true to say under what is ordered to be closed to people who pray are the genitalia and what may be loaded then it's not the genitals. Commands in the Qur'an that exists in this problem is (recommended) to ornate and beautify the appearance in prayer.

Allah says:

"Son of man, wear beautiful clothes in each (entering) the mosque" (QS.Al-A 'raf: 31)

So different from the closing aurat ornate, therefore, people who pray are not ordered to close the aurat. Prophet sallAllahu'alaihi wasallam forbade men (who perform) prayers in a state dipundaknya none at all (cover) clothes, whereas men's shoulders for not aurat according kesepakaatan scholars. The head and her hair is not aurat for husbands and fathers and brothers mahramnya like men. Even so, he was not allowed to pray in front of her husband and the mahramnya with open head, her head was not even allowed to open even if he prays alone, no one saw it.

It can be seen from this that the woman who opens her prayers as a theorem that shows that the face not the aurat is not true. For in prayer there is a special law, as opposed to the law closes genitalia outside of prayer.

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah rahimahullah have explained it by saying: "The woman then asked if the prayer itself with (wearing) Khimar (head covering), and in addition to prayer is permissible for him to open his head at home. Using jewelry in prayer is the right God, then no one was allowed to perform tawaf in the House (the condition) naked though alone at night. So do not be prayer in a naked condition although alone. From this it can be seen that wear jewelry in the prayer is not to cover up from the people. The provisions of each are different. People who pray may be ordered to shut down what may be disclosed outside of prayer, or may be disclosed in the prayer what is supposed to be hidden from men. The first was like a second shoulder, the Prophet sallAllahu'alaihi wasallam actually prohibit someone wearing an outfit that does not close his shoulder a bit. This is in prayer, (which) allowed both shoulders open to men outside of prayer. Likewise, independent woman, ordered to wear Khimar (head covering) in prayer. As word of the Prophet sallAllahu'alaihi wasallam "God does not accept the prayers which have been menstruating women (daughters) unless he is wearing Khimar (head covering)", but he was not ordered to wear Khimar (in front), her husband, and also in front of the mahramnya. Permissible for them to show the jewelry in for them but not allowed to open his head in prayer, both in front of them or the other.

The opposite of that, face, hands and both feet. Diboleh not revealed to others the strong opinion between two opinions (ulama). While not mandatory according to the scholars to close the deal, even allowed menampakkannya (face and both hands) in prayer according to the majority of scholars such as Abu Hanifa, Shafi'i, and apart from both, is also one of Ahmad's history. So is (are allowed to show) soles of the feet according to Abu Hanifah.

In general, has no provisions Demand nash, ijma (consensus scholars) that do not have to wear veils that cover him in prayer when he was in the house. However, if out (wearing the hijab). Then he can pray in her house even though visible face, both hands and both feet. As is the case when they first came out before commanded wearing the hijab. So the (legal) private parts in the prayer is not associated with the (legal) private parts in view.

Words of the jurists about the prayer in "Chapter Closes Aurat", there is no indication, either from the Prophet sallAllahu'alaih wasallam, nor from the Book and the Sunnah, that what is closed to the person who prays is aurat. Indeed, there is the word of God, "Put your clothes are beautiful in every (enter) the mosque", the Prophet forbade sallAllahu'alaihi wasallam tawaf Ka'bah in naked state, then pray more mainstream. He sallAllahu'alaihi wasallam was asked about praying with wearing a shirt, then he replied: "Or each of you (have) two-clothes?", And he says, relates to wear one shirt: "Had it widely, let wrapped (body) with him. If narrower, then make the gloves with him. " And he is also banned (prayers) by wearing a shirt that shoulders are not covered at all. This is (was) the proposition that the prayers were ordered closed as the thighs and other genitalia. Although we (men) are allowed to see it, If we take one opinion-that is one opinion of Ahmad-riyawat that the male genitalia (only), genitals, thighs therefore not the genitalia, which allow these men to see the thigh in a state not in prayer, thwaf. As for the prayer is not permissible for men opened her thighs, well who says he is aurat or not. Then not allowed thawaf naked. So he had to wear a dress in prayer, if narrowly made gloves, if widely dilipatkaan (to her). As if he was praying alone in the house, he'll have to close (thigh), according to the consensus of the scholars. If a person prays in the state of her thighs open while he is able to cover it with gloves, then this is not allowed. And should no longer differences (in this issue).

Who the (practice) with two history in private parts problem-as is done by some groups, then they are mistaken. Imam Ahmad was never mengataknnya, as well as (scholars), other, praying that someone can do (perform) prayers in this condition (open thighs). If Imam Ahmad ordered closed both shoulders, how could he allow her thighs open?

Indeed there are differences in the (problem) closed obligation for male genitalia that prayer alone. However, there is no difference if in prayer should wear clothes. Not allowed to pray in a state of nudity, even though he was able to wear clothes according to the consensus of the scholars. (Majmu al-Fataawa (22/113-117)

Ibn Qoyyim rahimahullah said: "Aurat that there are two (kinds), aurat aurat views and in prayer. Allowed a free man of prayer (in state) face and palms open, (but) not allowed out into the market and in places of gatherings of people. " (I'lamul-Muwaqi'in, 2 / 80)

Wallalhu'alam.

And Allaah knows best